Forgive me for going off the cuff here, but I have to say: not getting responded/written back to write in the school's newspaper, and having
this guy write on my subject of expertise (Yankees, Giants, Knicks, Rangers, etc.) and putting this ridiculous article out
really unnerves me...
But instead of complaining about it, why not
destroy his argument? :-)
From
the Fordham Observer:
The key to the formation of any dynasty is the development of young players from within the organization. The Yankees' dynasty of the 1990s, was largely centered on the development and success of young players like Bernie Williams, Derek Jeter, Andy Pettite and Mariano Rivera. The cycle of baseball has now come nearly full circle as these players prepare for the twilights of their careers.
Alright, we can agree there, but of course you got Bernie = Melky, Jeter = Cano, Pettite = Wang, and Mariano = we'll see... nicely written, but that's where all the nice and good stuff end...
This is an encouraging trend, but the Yankees need to further capitalize on their talent and build from within. Phillip Hughes is being touted as the best minor leaguer in baseball but needs to perform at the next level. Hopefully the Yankees can have him firmly established as a spot starter or the fifth man in the rotation by the end of next season. Brent Cox is one of the best relievers in the minor leagues and is said to be Mariano Rivera's heir. With relievers Tanyon Sturtze and Ron Villone expected to re-sign, this season should showcase a promising young bullpen of Sturtze and Villone, with Cox in a set-up role as he prepares for his inevitable usurpation of Rivera's closer role. Octavio Dotel has also filed for free agency and should be allowed to leave without a fight. In addition, the Yankees have an array of young, fast players in the minor leagues that are probably not ready to be starters in the majors, but can add energy and flexibility to the bench.
This is where the article goes
terribly wrong...
1.
J. Brent Cox is not Roger Clemens here, you want to throw in the fire-baller from AA straight
to the MLB? Yes, Cox has great statistics, (6 - 2 with 1.75 ERA in AA), but if you wanna develop him the right way,
don't bring him straight from AA to the MLB, it can
destroy a pitcher's development, and hinder his growth as a pitcher...
You heard of Sean Henn? After getting destroyed by the Mets two years ago, I haven't heard much about him either... just because he was a lefty, he was brought up from AA to the MLB, and well... let's look at his numbers now: 3 - 1, 4.01 ERA, 18 games, 6 starts in AAA... the Yankees are experimenting with using him as a reliever, but instead of him moving up to AAA last year, and possibly hearing him in the same breath as Karstens and Rasner for the 5th starter spot, he's stuck in AAA, not knowing whether he has the stuff/skill to be a starter or a reliever... that indecision 2 years ago has resulted in his average AAA stats, and destruction in the proper development of him... his psyche works as well as his skills, and to destroy a young pitcher's psyche like that can destroy his career...
Who was the last great young pitcher that has come
directly from the Royals or Devil Rays organization?
Exactly my point...
Lastly, is Mariano slowing down
that much for you to worry significantly about fast-tracking Cox from AA to the MLB? And did you completely give up and forget about Kyle Farnsworth? Gee, do your research...
2. "A promising
young bullpen of Sturtze and Villone?" That has got to be the most
idiotic thing I have read in The Observer...
First off, Strutze and Villone are
both 36! If 36 is young in baseball terms, Julio Franco would just be considered a veteran, instead of an old man who can still hack it...
Second, let's look at
Tanyon Sturtze, shall we? ERAs since 2003 (when he was converted to a reliever role): 5.94, 5.47, 4.73, 7.59... not exactly great for an average pitcher, eh? For a writer to seemingly give up on
Farnsworth (who's 30, and has better stats than Sturtze), but advocate the resigning of Sturtze has
got to be a joke... right?
With
Villone, I love the guy, and I loved his signing, but let me quote from one of my favorite blogs,
EJ from the Fire Joe Torre Blog on Villone:
Things started to unravel one month ago today. Villone was among the best relievers in baseball, pitching over 60 innings with a 2.23 ERA. Villone came in and gave up two runs in two innings, throwing 42 pitches against Baltimore. Including that appearance, Villone would then throw a total of 114 over the next three days. He would never be the same.
Since that 42 pitch outing, Villone has pitched just 12 innings, giving up 19 earned runs. His ERA has risen to 4.50. He had given up just 16 earned runs prior to that outing all year.
It's official. Ron Villone's arm is now completely useless. Good job Torre. We have lost an effective lefty weapon in the playoffs.
Torre
destroyed Villone's arm, as he has done with Quantrill and Karsey in the past, and add to the fact that Villone's 36... yea... uh...
no way would signing "young" Villone back would be the part thing to do...
3. If you say those things about our bench and our young, fast guys in the minors, why not
mention some of them? This is a college newspaper, not the silly high school newspaper stuff where details aren't needed...
Talk about Kevin Thompson, Kevin Reese (though not young nor really fast), Brett Gardner (fastest guy in our minor league system)...
talk about them, or at least,
mention them... if you're going to name-drop Cox, name-drop the other guys that you talk about... consistency is important, and this guy
doesn't have it... do your research...
***************
*whew* Alright, that was the first page of the 3-page article, here comes the 2nd one...
Alex Rodriguez has been one of the biggest disappointments in Yankees' recent history. His statistics reflect a seemingly solid player with a respectable, but not stellar average. But every Yankees fan knows how deeply his inconsistent play has set back the team. The unfortunate aspect of this situation is if Rodriguez was not the highest paid player in baseball history and was simply a young, unproven player trying to make his way in the harsh New York environment, he would have been forgiven. However, Rodriguez's salary and arrogance have magnified his inability to play consistently. The best thing for both sides in this situation would be a trade for A-Rod out of New York to a less pressurized venue. Rumors have been swirling that A-Rod's long-time friend and new manager of the Chicago Cubs, Lou Pinella, will attempt to acquire A-Rod for his new team. If this trade goes through and the Yankees are willing to pay a good portion of his inflated salary, the Yankees may be in a position to acquire Carlos Zambrano, a pitcher who could bolster the pitching staff for years to come.
This got me laughing quite a bit...
1. Let's work backwards... if you
really think the Cubs would trade their #1 best pitcher for A-Rod, especially in a game where pitching is a huge need for many teams, you
must be smoking something strong, and remember, kids, smoking is
bad for you... even if it's weed...
Plus Zambrano will be a free agent in 2008, so why get him now if we're gonna probably get him later?
2. "
His statistics reflect a seemingly solid player with a respectable, but not stellar average."
Nice to know that someone doesn't do their research... A-Rod has the 13th highest career batting average for active players, with every player above him possible to probable Hall of Famers... he has consistently hit 99 or more RBIs since 1996, he's the youngest player to hit 450 HRs, his OBP% this year ranked 19th (.392), and I fail to believe that this kid knows or even
cares to know what OBP% really means and the importance of actually
getting on base...
3. "
However, Rodriguez's salary and arrogance have magnified his inability to play consistently."
I may be blind, I may be deaf, but
how is A-Rod arrogant? What has A-Rod done to show himself "having or displaying a sense of overbearing self-worth or self-importance"? Was moving to 3rd base arrogant? Is having a
Family Organization arrogant? Please, explain this to someone who's deaf, dumb, and blind like me...
4.
"But every Yankees fan knows how deeply his inconsistent play has set back the team."Uh... dum, dawgone it... ah doesn't knows how his inconsissency has hurt th' Yankees... especially when Giambi has been mo'e inconsissent... (
thanks Dialectizer)... but seriously, when other players have been more inconsistent (i.e. Giambi among others), why put the inconsistent stamp on A-Rod?
I don't know if this kid knows baseball, but if you get a hit 3 out of 10 times up, you are a "good" player... is 3 out of 10 a term of consistency? Is being "clutch" a consistent term? Aaron Boone hit one of the most "clutch" HRs in all of playoff history... where is he now? Is he going into the Hall of Fame for such a "clutch" performance?
To consistently be one of the best players in the game today is what I like to call "
consistent"... and A-Rod has done that ever since 1996... so I don't understand where that "inconsistent play" comes from... this kid's seeing A-Rod through "ESPN glasses"... it's sad to see...
There are few free agents on the market who could have a real impact on the Yankees for more than a single season. Obviously a player like Alfonso Soriano would be a tremendous asset if he returned to his former New York home, but the Yankees have too much money invested in hitting as it is. They should pursue a player like Soriano only if a trade situation arises through which they can unload some of their age and salary for a younger, premier player.
They shouldn't pursue a player like Soriano
at all... our outfield is bloated with 4 All-Stars (Melky will be one, trust me)... Cano is a better defender at 2nd plus he has more upside at 2nd because he's younger (24 for Cano > 30 for Soriano)... plus Soriano will be warranting quite a bit of money...
There has been
no talk of Soriano rejoining the Yankees, so why start up ridiculous talks about him?
***************
Last page of garbage to deal with...
A few of the pitchers who may be in pinstripes next season in less-publicized signings could be Tony Armas, Bruce Chen, Gil Meche or former Yankee Ted Lilly. Jason Marquis, Jeff Suppan and Jeff Weaver should look to cash in on their team's World Series win by raising their profiles on the free agent market. Although Suppan is older than Marquis, his ability to remain healthy and his winning attitude might make him a candidate to join the 2007 Yankees.
Two words, kid: National League... Suppan's 12-7 with an ERA over 4 last year with the Cardinals... the Cardinals play in the National League... the National League is weak in hitting compared to the American League... put Suppan in the American League, and he'll get rocked...
In fact, in his last 2 years in the American League,
Jeff Suppan's ERA blew up to 5.32 in 2002 and 5.57 in 2003
before he was traded to the National League... and *gasps* his ERA improved greatly...
Plus, because of his playoff performances, the money he will be asking will be significantly more than he is worth...
Gil Meche compares to Suppan, is younger, and will ask for less money...
Also, unlike Suppan, Gil Meche is already adjusted to the American League, and through the guidance of Ron Guidry, improvement
can be made... Meche is 28, and pitchers
have made improvements... Suppan's 32, and he has seemed to adjust to the National League well...
Mark my words: if Suppan goes to the American League, he will
not be the same pitcher you saw in the playoffs, no question about it...
A pitcher like Zito, Schmidt or Suppan would be much more valuable to the Yankees. And with the Boston Red Sox having already won the Daisuke Matsuzaka bidding war, Zito looks to be the focus of the Yankees' offseason pursuits. Still, the Yankees should ensure that if they do decide to heavily court Zito, they should not neglect the other less high-profile free agents on the market.
Schmidt =
never pitched in the American League, same age as Suppan, and seems to negate this kid's idea of going younger... Schmidt's a great pitcher, no doubt, but why would you invest money on a pitcher who has never pitched in the American League, a league that significantly hits better and harder than the National League? My advice: if the Yankees want Schmidt, get him, but
beware the National League pitcher...
If Josh Beckett hasn't taught us anything about the plight of the National League pitcher, here's a picture that illustrates the plight...
And now, last but not least...
Though only one of them has major league experience, all of them are under 25 years old, which is exactly what the Yankees should be looking for in the future. Hopefully this early trend of dumping salary and age for youth and potential will continue and transfer itself to the bigger deals as well.
Dude, if you're going to say that,
mention the names of the pitchers! Oh wait, let
me do that for you...
Chris Britton (from Baltimore), Humberto Sanchez, Kevin Whelan and Anthony Claggett... Sanchez and Whelan were regarded as 2 of the Top 10 Tigers' prospects in 2005, we got great prospects for Sheffield and Wright...
mention them... talk about their stats, and what they bring to the Yankees...
This article could be spaced out for a couple of weeks... but of course, put all your eggs in one basket, why don't you?
This was the weakest Yankees article I have read in
any newspaper... using many ESPN points as well as lack of research hurt the legitimacy of this article and of this writer...
If
this is the best that the sports section of the
Observer can do, maybe I
am happy I wasn't contacted back to write...
Rob, all I can really say about your article is this:
do your research!Happy reading! :-)
B(rent)
